The Life of Pi - Yann Martel
Life of Pi – Yann Martel
Some stories do more than tell—they make you live them. Life of Pi is one of those stories. (Pause here; let the depth of that sink in.)
Yann Martel, a Canadian author, born in 1963, has spent his career exploring human resilience, spirituality, and the limits of imagination. (Emphasize “resilience, spirituality, and the limits of imagination.”) In Life of Pi, he invites readers into the interior life of Pi Patel, a boy thrown into unimaginable circumstances, and asks us to witness not just what happens—but what it feels like. (Slow slightly on “what it feels like.”)
The novel begins with a shipwreck in the Pacific Ocean, leaving Pi alone on a lifeboat with a Bengal tiger named Richard Parker. (Pause after “Richard Parker” to let the tension register.) From the very first waves, fear is constant, a tangible companion. Hunger gnaws, the sun scorches, storms rage, and the vast, empty sea becomes both prison and canvas. (Emphasize “prison and canvas” as contrasting images.) Pi’s struggle is not only for life but for sanity, morality, and faith. (Slowly, weight on each word.) Every decision, every glance at Richard Parker is a test of courage, restraint, and instinct.
Through Pi’s eyes, we feel the oscillation between despair and wonder. (Pause to let the contrast land.) The ocean is terrifying, yet breathtaking. Loneliness is crushing, yet it sharpens his awareness of life itself. Martel shows the emotional truth of survival—the panic that strikes in the dark, the fleeting joy of a sunrise, the careful calculation balancing fear and hope. (Slight pause between each element.)
At its heart, Life of Pi is about the resilience of the human spirit and the transformative power of storytelling. (Emphasize “resilience” and “transformative.”) Pi’s journey asks readers to inhabit his emotions fully—to feel the terror, the awe, the ethical tension, and the longing for connection. (Slightly slow pacing to emphasize each emotional aspect.)
This is a story about what it feels like to be utterly alone, yet utterly alive. (Pause dramatically.) And in following Pi across the endless ocean, we are asked: what does it mean to endure, to hope, and to believe when every element conspires to make you surrender? (End with deliberate pause.)
Martel’s prose carries philosophy lightly, like a parable told beside a fire. He suggests that when the world leaves us stranded—on a lifeboat, in grief, in uncertainty—it may be imagination, not certainty, that saves us.
Life of Pi is, in the end, a meditation on survival, belief, and the stories we choose when reality itself offers no comfort. Perhaps the truest thing about life, Martel seems to say, is not which story happened, but which one keeps us alive.
Reading 1 (Part 2)
My suffering left me sad and gloomy.
Academic study and the steady mindful practice of religion slowly
brought me back to life. I have kept up what some people would consider my
strange religious practices. After one year of high school, I attended the
University of Toronto and took a double-major Bachelor's degree. My majors
were religious studies and zoology My fourth-year thesis for religious studies
concerned certain aspects of the cosmogony theory of Isaac Luria, the great
sixteenth-century Kabbalist from Safed. My zoology thesis was a functional
analysis of the thyroid gland of the three-toed sloth. I chose the sloth because
its demeanour—calm, quiet and introspective—did something to soothe my
shattered self.
There are two-toed sloths and there are three-toed sloths, the case being
determined by the forepaws of the animals, since all sloths have three claws
on their hind paws. I had the great luck one summer of studying the three-toed
sloth in situ in the equatorial jungles of Brazil. It is a highly intriguing
creature. Its only real habit is indolence. It sleeps or rests on average twenty
hours a day. Our team tested the sleep habits of five wild three-toed sloths by
placing on their heads, in the early evening after they had fallen asleep, bright
red plastic dishes filled with water. We found them still in place late the next
morning, the water of the dishes swarming with insects. The sloth is at its
busiest at sunset, using the word busy here in the most relaxed sense. It moves
along the bough of a tree in its characteristic upside-down position at the
speed of roughly 400 metres an hour. On the ground, it crawls to its next tree
at the rate of 250 metres an hour, when motivated, which is 440 times slower
than a motivated cheetah.
I had the great luck one summer of studying the three-toed sloth in situ in the
equatorial jungles of Brazil.
Unmotivated, it covers four to five metres in an hour.
The three-toed sloth is not well informed about the outside world. On a
scale of 2 to 10, where 2 represents unusual dullness and 10 extreme acuity,
Beebe (1926) gave the sloth's senses of taste, touch, sight and hearing a rating
of 2, and its sense of smell a rating of 3. If you come upon a sleeping threetoed sloth in the wild, two or three nudges should suffice to awaken it; it will
then look sleepily in every direction but yours. Why it should look about is
uncertain since the sloth sees everything in a Magoo-like blur. As for hearing,
the sloth is not so much deaf as uninterested in sound. Beebe reported that
firing guns next to sleeping or feeding sloths elicited little reaction. And the
sloth's slightly better sense of smell should not be overestimated. They are
said to be able to sniff and avoid decayed branches, but Bullock (1968)
reported that sloths fall to the ground clinging to decayed branches "often".
How does it survive, you might ask.
Reading 2 (Part 3)
I loved my prayer rug. Ordinary in quality though it was, it glowed with
beauty in my eyes. I'm sorry I lost it. Wherever I laid it I felt special affection
for the patch of ground beneath it and the immediate surroundings, which to
me is a clear indication that it was a good prayer rug because it helped me
remember that the earth is the creation of God and sacred the same all over.
The pattern, in gold lines upon a background of red, was plain: a narrow
rectangle with a triangular peak at one extremity to indicate the qibla, the
direction of prayer, and little curlicues floating around it, like wisps of smoke
or accents from a strange language. The pile was soft. When I prayed, the
short, unknotted tassels were inches from the tip of my forehead at one end of
the carpet and inches from the tip of my toes at the other, a cozy size to make
you feel at home anywhere upon this vast earth.
I prayed outside because I liked it. Most often I unrolled my prayer rug in
a corner of the yard behind the house. It was a secluded spot in the shade of a
coral tree, next to a wall that was covered with bougainvillea. Along the
length of the wall was a row of potted poinsettias. The bougainvillea had also
crept through the tree. The contrast between its purple bracts and the red
flowers of the tree was very pretty. And when that tree was in bloom, it was a
regular aviary of crows, mynahs, babblers, rosy pastors, sunbirds and
parakeets. The wall was to my right, at a wide angle. Ahead of me and to my
left, beyond the milky, mottled shade of the tree, lay the sun-drenched open
space of the yard. The appearance of things changed, of course, depending on
the weather, the time of day, the time of year. But it's all very clear in my
memory, as if it never changed. I faced Mecca with the help of a line I
scratched into the pale yellow ground and carefully kept up.
Sometimes, upon finishing my prayers, I would turn and catch sight of
Father or Mother or Ravi observing me, until they got used to the sight.
My baptism was a slightly awkward affair. Mother played along nicely,
Father looked on stonily, and Ravi was mercifully absent because of a cricket
match, which did not prevent him from commenting at great length on the
event. The water trickled down my face and down my neck; though just a
beaker's worth, it had the refreshing effect of a monsoon rain.
Reading 3 (Part 4)
I said, "Richard Parker, is something wrong? Have you gone blind?" as I
waved my hand in his face.
For a day or two he had been rubbing his eyes and meowing
disconsolately, but I thought nothing of it. Aches and pains were the only part
of our diet that was abundant. I caught a dorado. We hadn't eaten anything in
three days. A turtle had come up to the lifeboat the day before, but I had been
too weak to pull it aboard. I cut the fish in two halves. Richard Parker was
looking my way. I threw him his share. I expected him to catch it in his mouth
smartly. It crashed into his blank face. He bent down. After sniffing left and
right, he found the fish and began eating it. We were slow eaters now.
I peered into his eyes. They looked no different from any other day.
Perhaps there was a little more discharge in the inner corners, but it was
nothing dramatic, certainly not as dramatic as his overall appearance. The
ordeal had reduced us to skin and bones.
I realized that I had my answer in the very act of looking. I was staring
into his eyes as if I were an eye doctor, while he was looking back vacantly.
Only a blind wild cat would fail to react to such a stare.
I felt pity for Richard Parker. Our end was approaching.
The next day I started feeling a stinging in my eyes. I rubbed and rubbed,
but the itch wouldn't go away. The very opposite: it got worse, and unlike
Richard Parker, my eyes started to ooze pus. Then darkness came, blink as I
might. At first it was right in front of me, a black spot at the centre of
everything. It spread into a blotch that reached to the edges of my vision. All I
saw of the sun the next morning was a crack of light at the top of my left eye,
like a small window too high up. By noon, everything was pitch-black.
I clung to life. I was weakly frantic. The heat was infernal. I had so little
strength I could no longer stand. My lips were hard and cracked. My mouth
was dry and pasty, coated with a glutinous saliva as foul to taste as it was to
smell. My skin was burnt. My shrivelled muscles ached. My limbs, especially
my feet, were swollen and a constant source of pain. I was hungry and once
again there was no food. As for water, Richard Parker was taking so much
that I was down to five spoonfuls a day. But this physical suffering was
nothing compared to the moral torture I was about to endure. I would rate the
day I went blind as the day my extreme suffering began. I could not tell you
when exactly in the journey it happened. Time, as I said before, became
irrelevant. It must have been sometime between the hundredth and the twohundredth day. I was certain I would not last another one.
Comments
Post a Comment