Nelson Mandela - Long Walk to Freedom - Memoir
Long Walk to Freedom – Nelson Mandela
Part 1: Introduction, Theme, Philosophy
Long Walk to Freedom — Overview, Theme, Philosophy, and Reception
Long Walk to Freedom
When we think of Nelson Mandela, // most of us picture the global icon: // the statesman, the president, the man who became a symbol of freedom and reconciliation.
But Long Walk to Freedom, his autobiography, reminds us that behind that image was a long, difficult, and very human journey. // It’s the story of a boy born in rural South Africa, in the Eastern Cape, who grew up herding cattle, playing stick-fighting games, and absorbing the traditions of his people— // and who went on to become one of the most influential figures of the twentieth century.
The book takes us through every stage of Mandela’s life: // his education, his gradual awakening to the brutal reality of apartheid, and his decision to dedicate himself to fighting it. // We follow his involvement with the African National Congress, his leadership in the anti-apartheid struggle, and of course, the extraordinary 27 years he spent in prison. // And we end with his release, // his election as South Africa’s first Black president, // and his effort to guide a nation through one of the most remarkable transitions in modern history.
But this isn’t just a history lesson. // It’s a deeply personal account. Mandela shares not only the victories, but also the doubts, the sacrifices, the loneliness, and the cost of choosing a path that demanded so much of him and of his family. // And that’s part of what makes this book so powerful. // It’s not just about what he accomplished— // it’s about who he had to become in order to accomplish it.
The central themes of Long Walk to Freedom are freedom, justice, perseverance, and moral courage. Mandela shows us that fighting systemic oppression requires enormous sacrifice— // not only the years of his life spent behind bars, but also the personal toll it took on his relationships and family. // Yet, just as important as his perseverance is his capacity for forgiveness. His story shows that true leadership is not about power or revenge— // it is rooted in integrity, humility, and a vision of dignity and equality for all people.
And that philosophy is what makes this book resonate far beyond South Africa. // Mandela teaches us that progress is rarely quick or easy. // It requires patience, persistence, and the ability to maintain hope even when the odds seem impossible. // He shows us that change is possible— // not when fueled by hatred, // but when guided by moral conviction, collective action, and the courage to challenge injustice while still believing in reconciliation.
So—why should you read Long Walk to Freedom? // Because it’s more than the autobiography of one man. // It’s a roadmap for resilience, for justice, for leadership in the truest sense. // It reminds us that history is shaped not only by speeches and victories, but by sacrifice, perseverance, and the daily choice to remain true to one’s principles. // It’s a book that inspires, challenges, and humbles all at once.
In the end, Long Walk to Freedom is not just Mandela’s story. // It’s a universal reminder that the struggle for justice is a long journey, but one worth walking. // And it leaves us asking ourselves: when faced with injustice, do we have the patience, the hope, and the moral courage to take that walk too?Part 2: Reading Segment 1 (3 mins)
Excerpt:
APART FROM LIFE, a strong constitution, and an abiding connection to
the Thembu royal house, the only thing my father bestowed upon me at
birth was a name, Rolihlahla. In Xhosa, Rolihlahla literally means “pulling
the branch of a tree,” but its colloquial meaning more accurately would be
“troublemaker.” I do not believe that names are destiny or that my father
somehow divined my future, but in later years, friends and relatives would
ascribe to my birth name the many storms I have both caused and
weathered. My more familiar English or Christian name was not given to
me until my first day of school. But I am getting ahead of myself.
I was born on the eighteenth of July, 1918, at Mvezo, a tiny village on the
banks of the Mbashe River in the district of Umtata, the capital of the
Transkei. The year of my birth marked the end of the Great War; the
outbreak of an influenza epidemic that killed millions throughout the world;
and the visit of a delegation of the African National Congress to the
Versailles peace conference to voice the grievances of the African people of
South Africa. Mvezo, however, was a place apart, a tiny precinct removed
from the world of great events, where life was lived much as it had been for
hundreds of years.
The Transkei is eight hundred miles east of Cape Town, five hundred
fifty miles south of Johannesburg, and lies between the Kei River and the
Natal border, between the rugged Drakensberg mountains to the north and
the blue waters of the Indian Ocean to the east. It is a beautiful country of
rolling hills, fertile valleys, and a thousand rivers and streams, which keep
the landscape green even in winter. The Transkei used to be one of the
largest territorial divisions within South Africa, covering an area the size of
Switzerland, with a population of about three and a half million Xhosas and
a tiny minority of Basothos and whites. It is home to the Thembu people,
who are part of the Xhosa nation, of which I am a member.
My father, Gadla Henry Mphakanyiswa, was a chief by both blood and
custom. He was confirmed as chief of Mvezo by the king of the Thembu
tribe, but under British rule, his selection had to be ratified by the
government, which in Mvezo took the form of the local magistrate. As a
government-appointed chief, he was eligible for a stipend as well as a
portion of the fees the government levied on the community for vaccination
of livestock and communal grazing land. Although the role of chief was a
venerable and esteemed one, it had, even seventy-five years ago, become
debased by the control of an unsympathetic white government.
Part 3: Reading Segment 2
Excerpt IN 1937, when I was nineteen, I joined Justice at Healdtown, the Wesleyan
College in Fort Beaufort, about one hundred seventy-five miles southwest
of Umtata. In the nineteenth century, Fort Beaufort was one of a number of
British outposts during the so-called Frontier Wars, in which a steady
encroachment of white settlers systematically dispossessed the various
Xhosa tribes of their land. Over a century of conflict, many Xhosa warriors
achieved fame for their bravery, men like Makhanda, Sandile, and Maqoma,
the last two of whom were imprisoned on Robben Island by the British
authorities, where they died. By the time of my arrival at Healdtown, there
were few signs of the battles of the previous century, except the main one:
Fort Beaufort was a white town where once only the Xhosa lived and
farmed.
Located at the end of a winding road overlooking a verdant valley,
Healdtown was far more beautiful and impressive than Clarkebury. It was,
at the time, the largest African school below the equator, with more than a
thousand students, both male and female. Its graceful ivy-covered colonial
buildings and tree-shaded courtyards gave it the feeling of a privileged
academic oasis, which is precisely what it was. Like Clarkebury, Healdtown
was a mission school of the Methodist Church, and provided a Christian
and liberal arts education based on an English model.
The principal of Healdtown was Dr. Arthur Wellington, a stout and stuffy
Englishman who boasted of his connection to the Duke of Wellington. At
the outset of assemblies, Dr. Wellington would walk onstage and say, in his
deep bass voice, “I am the descendant of the great Duke of Wellington,
aristocrat, statesman, and general, who crushed the Frenchman Napoleon at
Waterloo and thereby saved civilization for Europe — and for you, the
natives.” At this, we would all enthusiastically applaud, each of us
profoundly grateful that a descendant of the great Duke of Wellington
would take the trouble to educate natives such as ourselves. The educated
Englishman was our model; what we aspired to be were “black
Englishmen,” as we were sometimes derisively called. We were taught —
Part 4: Reading Segment 3
Excerpt Although I was prevented from attending the 1952 annual conference, I was
immediately informed as to what had transpired. One of the most
significant decisions was one taken in secret and not publicized at the time.
Along with many others, I had become convinced that the government
intended to declare the ANC and the SAIC illegal organizations, just as it
had done with the Communist Party. It seemed inevitable that the state
would attempt to put us out of business as a legal organization as soon as it
could. With this in mind, I approached the National Executive Committee
with the idea that we must come up with a contingency plan for just such an
eventuality. I said it would be an abdication of our responsibility as leaders
of the people if we did not do so. They instructed me to draw up a plan that
would enable the organization to operate from underground. This strategy
came to be known as the Mandela-Plan, or simply, M-Plan.
The idea was to set up organizational machinery that would allow the
ANC to make decisions at the highest level, which could then be swiftly
transmitted to the organization as a whole without calling a meeting. In
other words, it would allow an illegal organization to continue to function
and enable leaders who were banned to continue to lead. The M-Plan was
designed to allow the organization to recruit new members, respond to local
and national problems, and maintain regular contact between the
membership and the underground leadership.
I held a number of secret meetings among ANC and SAIC leaders, both
banned and not banned, to discuss the parameters of the plan. I worked on it
for a number of months and came up with a system that was broad enough
to adapt itself to local conditions and not fetter individual initiative, but
detailed enough to facilitate order. The smallest unit was the cell, which in
urban townships consisted of roughly ten houses on a street. A cell steward
would be in charge of each of these units. If a street had more than ten
houses, a street steward would take charge and the cell stewards would
report to him. A group of streets formed a zone directed by a chief steward,
who was in turn responsible to the secretariat of the local branch of the
ANC. The secretariat was a subcommittee of the branch executive, which
reported to the provincial secretary. My notion was that every cell and street
steward should know every person and family in his area, so that he would
be trusted by the people and would know whom to trust. The cell steward
arranged meetings, organized political classes, and collected dues. He was
the linchpin of the plan. Although the strategy was primarily created for
more urban areas, it could be adapted to rural ones.
Comments
Post a Comment